Kyle Adam is a seasoned content creator, editor, and SEO specialist with over four years of experience. Presently, he serves as a Marketing Writer at LawDepot. Holding a Bachelor of Communication Studies from MacEwan University, he further honed his skills with an Associate’s Certificate in Graphic Design from British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT). Kyle seamlessly blends his love for arts and writing to craft compelling content. He’s enthusiastic about explaining complex topics by using simple, accessible language and effective visuals.
Fact checked by
Jasmine Roy, BCSJasmine is a professional writer, editor, and SEO specialist with over five years of experience in content creation and digital marketing. In 2018, she completed her Bachelor of Communication Studies at MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta. She's been telling stories and passing on important information to the public ever since. Starting her career in journalism, Jasmine has always had a strong sense of civic engagement and the importance of law. Now, she uses her communication skills as a Marketing Writer and Editor at LawDepot.
Verbal contracts are a common part of our everyday lives. We make agreements with people all the time without putting anything in writing. But what happens when a dispute arises and there's no written contract to refer to ? Is a verbal contract legally binding?
The answer is more complex than you might think. In this article, we'll explore the validity and limitations of verbal contracts, as well as the risks of not putting agreements into writing.
But first, let’s define a verbal contract.When two or more parties come to an agreement without any written documentation, they create a verbal contract. A verbal contract is also known as a:
Verbal contracts can be legally binding , meaning there are some exceptions. Despite being considerably harder to verify and prove, some verbal agreements can hold the same legal weight as written ones.
Like written ones, verbal contracts must include the elements of a valid contract to be enforceable and legally binding. In case you need a refresher, the required elements are as follows:
But we can’t just stop there with our answer because it’s a bit more complex. Although verbal contracts can be enforceable, is doing away with written contracts the right answer? Is there a time and place for verbal agreements?
In the next section, let’s discuss some important exceptions that exist.Going back as far as the 17th century, common law developed a legal principle called the statute of frauds . If you create a contract covered by this statute, you and the other party must put it in writing and sign it for it to be enforceable.
Most states have adopted a modern-day statute of frauds and the goal remains to prevent fraud and other injury .
Since the statute of frauds differs from state to state, the requirements for written contracts vary. After checking your state’s requirements, you may find that the following contracts must be put in writing:
In certain instances, verbal agreements are insufficient even though written ones aren’t legally required. Not having a written contract creates unnecessary risk for the parties involved. One of the main issues is that the precise terms of verbal agreements are difficult to prove in court .
In all of the cases listed below, having a written contract in place can provide legal protection for both parties in case of a dispute, saving time and money in the long run:
Verbal contracts can be appropriate in some situations , especially in cases where the parties involved know each other and the risk of loss is small.
Here are some examples of situations where a verbal contract might be appropriate and sufficient:Even in the above cases, writing up some type of receipt or record is never a bad idea. Outside of these examples, it's generally best practice to use written contracts . For more complex or important transactions or arrangements, using written contracts will help you avoid misunderstandings and costly legal disputes.
Yes, verbal contracts can hold up in court , if a court determines there is sufficient evidence to prove the existence and terms of a binding agreement.
If one party breaches a verbal contract and the wronged party sues, the legal outcome depends on a number of factors, including:
As stated above, a verbal contract can be enforceable under the law, just like a written agreement. But, proving the terms of a verbal contract is more challenging than proving a written one because there is no physical document that outlines the agreement terms.
Suppose the wronged party can provide sufficient evidence to support their claim that a verbal contract existed and that the other party breached that agreement. In that case, they may be able to win a lawsuit and receive damages or other legal remedies.
The evidence used to support a claim may include:While verbal contracts can be legally binding in certain situations, written ones are more reliable and enforceable. Relying solely on verbal agreements can lead to misunderstandings, disagreements, and legal disputes , which can be costly and time-consuming.
To avoid potential legal issues down the road, it's always best to have significant agreements put in writing, even if it seems like a minor deal at the time.
Ultimately, taking the time to create a written contract can save a lot of time, money, and headaches in the long run.